Playback of L/R is just OK (global on/off switch) Unfortunately, it's occasionally unstable/buggy (particularly with some 3rd party plugins). This has been my go-to app for quick edits and recording simple and straightforward. Runs 3rd party FX plugins, but buggy/unstable with some Rudimentary “gap” marker & “Split by markers” More thorough than I expected (no wonder it's so popular) but some basic usability functions wouldn't mesh with how I work Zooming/highlighting requires key/mouse combos or menu clicksĬan’t play L/R channels without first splitting the stereo fileĬreating/exporting labels (regions) is a bit clunky (but offers leading/trailing silence)Īdding 3rd party FX plugins is also a bit clunky Stereo files displayed as a single track is a killer for me tho. I like the simplicity but it's missing a few basic features. “Smart split” is simple but it works & outputs splits easily I'm also not taking price into consideration in these cases because they're mostly lower cost.ĭisplays stereo files as one waveform-no L/R editing/playback I'm most concerned with: ease of mouse zooming/highlighting & generally zipping around a file, playing/editing L/R channels of a stereo file independently, running 3rd party FX, splitting recorded sections into regions/labels/markers/etc, and outputting those splits as separate files. I only tested these with functions that I use most often (ie: these won't be the same for everyone) but I'm sure some of these have great features I don't know about. Another option might be to see what game developers are using (maybe look around on Steam), options which might look more "game-oriented," but have the features you need.īut generally speaking, it is the case that simple, easy-to-use software doesn't have a good business model, so a lot of it has died out.įirst run on some of the rec'd apps. That's what happens in a lot of professional environments. In other cases, using an emulator for an old OS can work, or sticking with an old machine that consistently runs your production software. OS changes, security measures, language changes, adware, business models other than ad/spyware dying out, "mobile-first" being the only viable option, these all add up to degrade the experience of what used to be simpler, more effective, more direct ways of doing things for professional-quality desktop programs.įor workable solutions, in some cases, migrating to browser-based versions of older software can work, but the restrictions of browsers can be problematic. I'm not sure this is the correct way to view things software for working professionals in a number of fields has gotten measurably worse over time, due to business changes and the shifts in computing platforms making stability hard to come by. ***I should add that, on a daily basis, I use SoundStudio 4 ( ) which is fine for simple, one-off waveform editing but not suited to larger projects involving regions and batch processing. On the other end of the spectrum are the freebie/low cost apps like Audacity and WavePad (and many others) but I don't know if these will have the functions I need and I haven't bothered to find out because I'm not sure if I trust these with an entire sample library production.Īre simple audio editors/batch processors a thing of the past? What apps are people using? I don't need a BMW, just a reliable Toyota. I've seen others like Samplitude, FL Studio, RX8, etc etc but these are expensive and, frankly, too complicated and overloaded with features for the simple type of editing I do. I briefly tried Pro Tools First and PreSonus Studio One-thinking these would be simpler, paired-down versions of their bloatware-but the UIs were a learning curve, simple functions not obvious, and I think I encountered the same shortcomings as with Triumph. For waveform editing, you need quick, direct mouse control on a waveform for zooming, shuttling, selecting, dragging, fading etc etc and Triumph had weird key combinations and odd mouse settings for doing this. I bought Triumph a couple years ago but it turned out to be surprisingly non-user-friendly. Among other things, I make sample libraries which involves a lot of detailed waveform work as well as batch processing. I'm still using an older version of Sound Forge (buggy as hell) on an old Mac because I honestly haven't found a good replacement. everything in a new thread (with prices): Īs someone who started audio editing way back with SoundEdit16 and Sound Forge, I'm having a really hard time finding similar software that can run on newer OS X versions. Cheers for all the suggestions/advice adapt or die. *UPDATE* This post kinda blew up so there are a ton of good recs I'm trying to follow up on now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |